| Instructor: Dr Kenneth Chan
|
Oral Presentations
This exercise represents 10% of your total course grade. In
a 10-15 minute presentation, you are to provide the class with
either an analysis/critique of a theoretical text or an
interpretation of a literary/filmic text. The goal is not
to summarize what the author is saying (although you may
have to do some summary and descriptive work to make your
point). Rather, I would expect you to present (1) an extension
or expansion of an idea you have encountered in a text, (2) a
practical application of a theoretical concept, (3) a personal
reading (interpretation) of a literary/filmic work, and/or (4)
a critique of the arguments and the assumptions of the author
within the text. Your presentation should serve to provoke
class discussion by engaging relevant issues of controversy as
they appear in our readings; in other words, do not be afraid
to (proverbially speaking) open a can of (ideological) worms
or challenge certain conceptual boundaries. You are required
to provide the entire class with an outline (about one page,
typed, and in complete sentences) of your presentation on the
day you are scheduled to give it. After your brief 10-15
minute speech, you will lead the class in discussion by asking
pertinent and catalytic questions. Your grade will not only be
based on your ideas and speech, but it will also include your
effectiveness at engaging your classmates in discussion.
Remember that once you have signed up for the presentation,
you are required to be present and ready on the day you are
scheduled. Absences without valid documentation (e.g. medical
certificate) will result in a penalty deduction of 10% of your
final course grade. Hence, please be responsible! I would also
discourage any changes to the text you have chosen, but you
may come and see me for alternatives if you do encounter
problems. However, please do so at least 5 days prior to your
presentation. Once more, the key to this presentation is to
avoid simply regurgitating the main points of the author's
argument or summarizing the plot of a literary or filmic work.
(We all can read or view the text for ourselves.) What I would
like to suggest instead is a more critical and analytical
approach that will involve close readings of the text and a
measure of ingenuity in formulating a coherent and
well-supported argument in your presentation. One way of
approaching this is to think of your preparation work and the
actual presentation as you would in writing an essay (right up
to the sentence outline stage and without actually writing the
essay). The following are some pointers and guidelines you may
use as a way of getting started:
The Brainstorming Stage:
The questions and suggestions here are meant to help you
come up with ideas you may or may not use in your
presentation. Hence, do not slavishly and programmatically
follow this guide, believing it to be the perfect model. It is
not!!!
1. Establish a basic understanding of the context:
- Who is the author or filmmaker? What are the historical,
cultural, social, and political factors at work that
motivate the author to write or direct this work?
- Who is the target audience? Is the audience hostile,
friendly, or neutral? How can you know this from the text?
How does an intended audience actually affect the way the
text is constructed?
- What is the text about? If it is a critical text, what
is the main thesis? Can you identify the various points of
argument used to support the essay? What are some of the
evidence the author relies on to substantiate her arguments?
- What kind of text is it? Can you identify the genre?
What is the chief purpose of the text?
2. Read deeper:
- Do you agree or disagree with the arguments made? Why?
Can you identify specifically the point(s) in the author's
argument that you have difficulty with?
- Is the author's use of evidence convincing? Why or why
not?
- What are some of the assumptions behind the arguments
made? Are they problematic in any way, and why?
- What is the ideological position of the author? How do
you know this from the text?
- Identify points of rhetorical conflict and
contradictions in the text.
- What is the overall world-view of the author and the
text?
3. Hot Spots!
- As you read or view the text, identify Hot Spots!
- Specific points of interest and significance you think may
be of importance to you.
- For the printed text, underline or highlight the text so
that you can easily identify them.
- Write notes about these points. Ask pointed questions as
a way of interrogating these Hot Spots! What issue is
raised here, what is at stake for you in engaging this
point, why is this point significant to you or to the author
or filmmaker, or why is it controversial and interesting
enough for you to identify it as a Hot Spot!?
- Use these Hot Spots! as stepping stones for
brainstorming about various topics and issues. Do not
restrict yourself in your brainstorming. Ideas that seem
irrelevant or absurd may actually come in handy and useful
later.
The Presentation Stage:
1. Formulation:
- Gather all your notes and ideas together, and begin to
identify possible topics and approaches you may want to
adopt in your presentation.
- Establish a thesis.
- Work out an argument outline with points and sub-points.
- Incorporate examples, inferences, textual references,
and explanations into your outline.
- Since it is only a sentence outline that you need to
offer to the class, keep your outline to a single typed
page, double-spaced. Retain details for your actual oral
presentation.
- Be sure to print out enough copies of your outline for
the class.
2. Presentation:
- Since your presentation should only be 10-15 minutes, be
selective about how many points you want to present. Plan
more, but be willing to cut back on the number. Hence, you
select only the strongest points for presentation.
- Practice giving your oral presentation by timing
yourself. Try to keep it within the time frame and do not
exceed 20 minutes.
- Write out a couple of questions you want to ask the
class to ensure that there will be discussion. If your
presentation goes well, there should be sufficient issues of
controversy and provocation to generate a lively debate.
Should this not be the case, the questions will serve as a
back up for infusing some talk. Your questions, therefore,
have to be well thought out and provocative-by all means,
play the devil's advocate.
Please come and see me at least a day before the
presentation. You can also either call me at home or at my
office. It is crucial that you talk to me about your
presentation before you give it.
|